Facts and Judgment
R v Dytham  QB 722
The defendant was a police officer. He stood by whilst a bouncer kicked a man to death. He was charged with the offence of misconduct in a public officer. He argued that the offence could not be committed by an omission as it specifically requires misconduct.
The offence of misconduct in a public offence can be committed by an omission. The defendant's conviction was upheld. Back to lecture outline on actus reus